Reading Together

What if the entire community read the same book at the same time? Read and discuss Amy Waldman’s The Submission with people of all walks of life.

Pondering Our Nation’s Afterlife

A line late in The Submission points to what I feel may be a great truth: “It’s almost like we fight over what we can’t settle in real life through symbols. They’re our nation’s afterlife” (332). Several separate strands about our country and the world flow through my mind as I ponder this quote.

First, there is so much in life that we can’t control that we try to take super control of tangential things. This seems apparent with the after-Newtown struggles about gun control. We want so much to keep our children safe, and there is no way to ensure their safety, so we fight over who should have guns, as if one answer will take care of the problem. We argue and picket about gun control and mental health, whether or not children should be vaccinated, and what is appropriate for children to eat at what age—and these are all areas that need our attention, but in our hearts we know that none of those things can fully protect our children. In The Submission, the characters struggle with what the 9/11 monument should be, almost as if the perfect monument could in some way erase the tragedy. How do you protect all of the children? How do you make a monument that gives everyone a sense of peace and closure?

In the end, it is really only William who finds closure and that is with a small cairn in a faraway garden. We need symbols. We need closure. We need to feel we’re doing everything we can, but all too often “everything we can,” as in The Submission, falls short of anyone’s lofty goals. And symbols, however needed and important they may be, are certainly not what I hope for when I think of our nation’s afterlife.

Second, along somewhat the same vein, I was caught by the number of times “who wins” is either stated or implied in the novel. This is what I fear more than settling for symbols. Everything has become a contest, and losers do not graciously concede and work together with winners. It is like we say “I may not have won, but I sure can make you sorry you did. If I am not on your side, no idea you have can have merit, and I will oppose you with my every breath.” What we may end up with is a metaphorical plaza of flags, solutions that work for no one. Perhaps it is time to stop taking sides, stop keeping score of winners and losers and do something more meaningful for our national afterlife.

~Sherry Ransford-Ramsdell

Reading Together Steering Committee

More blog posts

Reading Together on TwitterReading Together on FacebookKPL YouTube ChannelKPL Flickr Photostream

In the News »

Mar 31, 2013
Brooke GladstoneBrooke Gladstone
"On the Media" in Kalamazoo
Mar 23, 2013
NPR host to speakNPR host to speak
as part of Reading Together program
Mar 19, 2013
NPR's Brooke GladstoneNPR's Brooke Gladstone
to speak at WMU
Mar 8, 2013
Amy WaldmanAmy Waldman
writing, the media and characters
Mar 6, 2013
Crowds turn out Crowds turn out
for Reading Together program
Mar 5, 2013
Amy WaldmanAmy Waldman
to speak tonight in Kalamazoo
Mar 4, 2013
The SubmissionThe Submission
A book about 9/11, that's not...
Feb 27, 2013
MLive Book ClubMLive Book Club
fiction ended up looking like real life
Feb 14, 2013
'The Submission' 'The Submission'
wins over this non-fiction reader
Feb 1, 2013
MLive Book ClubMLive Book Club
February's pick will be The Submission
Aug 29, 2012
Library announcesLibrary announces
Reading Together selection for 2013